Saturday, 22 July 2017

Women RIGHTS are Human RIGHTS!


Three years ago, many of us fervently and angrily swamped personal and public spaces and unanimously condemned a then emerging trend of stripping of women in public for ‘indecent dressing’. We came out in our numbers, young and old, women and men, and shouted ourselves hoarse in Nairobi City streets to express solidarity with the victims of the retrogressive acts and ‘My Dress My Choice’ rallying call. Yours truly hauled a 7-months pregnancy in a mini and took part in the procession all the way. It felt great that at least all the women rights activism and advocacy of yesteryears was not in vain, had bore sweet fruits!

Fast forward to events over the past week and what an appalling contradiction!

It all started with the ‘shock’ sentencing of ‘Githurai three’ to death on account of guilty verdict on robbery with violence and sexual assault charges. The media was soon after awash with the skewed ‘harshest judgement ever’ pitch and innuendo which the public was only too eager to pick and peddle. Screaming headlines and breaking news set the stage, ‘Stripping woman earns three men death sentence’, ‘Three Sentenced To Death For Assaulting A Woman Inside A Githurai Bound Matatu’, ‘Three to hang for stripping, sexually assaulting Githurai woman’, ‘Three Githurai matatu operators to hang for undressing woman’, ‘Three Githurai Men Sentenced to Death over STRIPPING A Woman wearing mini Skirt Naked’, ‘Three men who undressed woman in Githurai to hang’. The sequel hit the message home ‘....It is the harshest judgement yet to be meted out on sex offenders’, ‘What began as a pat on a woman’s buttocks as she alighted from the vehicle has ended up as a capital offence’, ‘Mixed reaction to death penalty for three Githurai touts’, ‘Was the court too harsh on the Githurai three?’ ‘Your take on the death sentence passed on the Three Githurai matatu operators for undressing a woman?’ Then it was all ditto, with many ‘legal experts’ proclaiming how harsh, unfair, discriminatory, unjustified the sentence was.

My primary quarrel with the aforementioned media coverage slant was the seeming deliberate focus on telling half of the story and the question of minimizing violence against women and women rights violations rearing its ugly head in matters sexual offences.

The three accused were charged with robbery with violence and sexual assault and the prosecution successfully proved accordingly. Apparently, the accused beat the concerned woman, stripped her naked, sexually molested her by inserting their fingers in her private parts while pulling her breast, threatened to gang rape her and robbed her of a mobile phone, a handbag and Sh10,000. All because the woman protested against one of the accused touching her buttocks as she alighted from the vehicle. The presiding Chief Magistrate described the incident as ‘a cruel act of bestiality from uncultured men’.

The law prescribes a mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence and minimum of 10years for sexual assault. The three accused were subsequently sentenced to death for robbery with violence and 25 years suspended sentence for sexual assault. Question of whether the judgement was legally justified therefore should not arise. Rather the question should have been whether the robbery with violence charges was proved beyond reasonable doubt.

That the ensuing raging debate has chosen to conveniently revolve around the death sentence vis a viz the act of stripping beats logic and begs some questions – Why the double standards? Does robbery with violence become a lesser crime on the basis of sexual assault? Why single out sexual assault as a basis for different treatment?  What is for certain is that victims of sexual assault are largely female and the perpetrators are largely male. It is therefore not lost on some of us that the media coverage and subsequent debate is just but a manifestation of minimisation of violence against women and violation of women rights.  

We must choose not to split hairs about violence against women!

We must choose to take a firm stand for women rights as human rights! 

No comments:

Post a Comment